WELL… SOMEONE HAS TO BE…
Citing a 5 March Wall Street Journal article, blogger Tom Barnett makes the case that Wal-Mart best serves the bottom of the economic pyramid and that it only fails when it tries to drag itself higher. It’s easier to sell to the desperate than those able to make real choices.
Wal-Mart keeps screwing up in affluent markets, like Germany, Japan, large U.S. cities, but routinely cleans up in developing or emerging markets, where it’s sell to the bottom of the pyramid mentality meets an aggressive desire on the part of consumers for better economic connectivity (“My modest income is now connected to so many more choices!”).
Turns out poor Central Americans like Wal-Mart for all the same reasons why the rural red states in America like it too.
It connects and empowers while, yes, simultaneously reconfiguring local markets–the essence of globalization.
And when you live day-to-day, paycheck-to-paycheck, cheap plastic crap can seem to be pretty good.
[...] Goldman Sachs announced today that it has lowered its rating on Wal-Mart from buy to neutral based on weak sales performance. Given that Wal-Mart caters to the base of the economic pyramid, I have to wonder if this is a canary in the mine moment for the U.S. economy. Are Wal-Mart shoppers running out of credit cards to run up? [...]