WHAT DOES TENNESSEE THAT OTHERS DON’T…?
Why has Tennessee unilaterally withdrawn from the Wal-Mart energy audit program that it — and 18 other state governments — signed on to earlier this month? Only the government knows and it isn’t talking. Was there too much public in the public-private partnership?
From the Associated Press:
Under the program announced May 6 at the National Governors Association’s State Summit on Clean Power and Efficiency, engineers paid by Wal-Mart will visit the capitol facilities to examine lighting, heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems, refrigeration equipment and building structures.
“We’re supportive of Wal-Mart’s broader initiative,” Will Pinkston, senior adviser to Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, said in an e-mail. “But we’ve had a couple of false starts that probably were unique to Tennessee, and we’ve run into some unrelated issues that frankly complicated things.” Pinkston did not elaborate on those issues.
“All things considered, we’re just going to move in a different direction right now,” he said.
What kind of unrelated issues would stop an energy audit? What possible direction could the governor want to move? I wonder if Gov. Bredesen has second thoughts about non-state employees crawling around in the duct work.
And I have to wonder why such a hyper-local story was covered by the AP and not a local paper. They do have journalists in Tennessee don’t they?
[...] An anti-Walmart blog has some questions for folks in Tennessee government after it was revealed that Tennessee unilaterally withdrew from a partnership with Walmart that would have made our state capitol the first to undergo an extensive energy audit: What kind of unrelated issues would stop an energy audit? What possible direction could the governor want to move? I wonder if Gov. Bredesen has second thoughts about non-state employees crawling around in the duct work. [...]